Wednesday, September 17, 2014

Worrying Smarter: Singing the ATV Blues

by Natalia E. Pane, M.A., M.B.A
My name is Cynde Nichols. I live in Caldwell, Idaho. I have 3 boys and 3 girls. My family and I were avid atv riders. We own 5 atvs. A suzuki 80, a 250 trail boss, a 400 scrambler, a 425 magnum and a 700 sportsman. My husband and I have rode atvs for 11 years. My husband and Murphy were up camping and we were going to meet them in 2 days. They were riding the 700 sportsman just down the road from camp to see if they could see fish in the river. Murphy was riding in front on the 700 sportsman with his dad driving. They slid on some loose gravel and the 4 wheeler flipped. Throwing my husband and Murphy off…”
This is how just one of the nearly 70 stories on “Concerned Families for ATV Safety”[i] begins. These are families who lost children in ATV accidents and do not want you to suffer their fate. ATVs are dangerous enough that the federal government even has a special website designed just to address ATV accidents, recognizing how deadly these vehicles can be if not used properly: www.atvsafety.gov.
ATVATVs are one of the deadliest forms of transportation for our children. ATVs are responsible for 40% more child deaths than bicycles. For children ages ten to fourteen, ATVs are responsible for three-times the numbers of deaths as motorcycles.[ii] Boating, skateboarding, and other activities don’t even come close.
For younger children, a common incident is an attempt to travel up too steep a hill ends in the ATV flipping over and crushing them.  Other incidents include getting knocked off, and not having a helmet to protect them because, for example, they were just going for a quick ride around grandpa’s yard. Even small bumps can have big consequences. I read one story about a child who died when he and his father were done with their ride and simply pulling the ATV back into the garage. The little hump entry into the garage was enough to shoot the child off.
For ten to fourteen year olds, about 75 percent of the time, the child who died was the driver of the ATV.[iii]  The driver-incidents were equally divided between collisions (e.g., hitting another ATV) and noncollisions (e.g., flipping the lone ATV). Of those who died, only about one in five (20 percent)[iv] was wearing a helmet.
Heads up to West Virginians: you have two times the rate of fatalities compared to any other state, factoring in population. Next in line are North Dakota, Alaska, Wyoming, Kentucky, Idaho, Montana, Vermont, Mississippi, and South Dakota.
Recommendations from www.atvsafety.gov include:
  • Every rider should take a hands-on safety course. Formal training teaches drivers how to control ATVs in typical situations. Drivers with formal, hands-on ATV training have a lower injury risk than drivers with no formal training.
  • Always wear protective gear—especially a helmet—when riding an ATV. Select a motorcycle or other motorized sports helmet and make sure it is certified by the US Department of Transportation and/or the Snell Memorial Foundation.
  • Do not drive an ATV with a passenger or ride as a passenger. The majority of ATVs are designed to carry only one person. ATVs are designed for interactive riding—drivers must be able to shift their weight freely in all directions, depending on the situation and terrain. Interactive riding is critical to maintaining safe control of an ATV, especially on varying terrain. Passengers can make it difficult for drivers to control the ATV.
  • Do not drive ATVs on paved roads. Because of their design, ATVs are difficult to control on paved roads. Many fatalities involving ATVs occur on paved roads.
  • Do not permit children to drive or ride on adult ATVs. Children are involved in about one-third of all ATV-related deaths and hospital emergency room injuries. Most of these deaths and injuries occur when a child is driving or riding on an adult ATV. Children under sixteen riding adult ATVs are twice as likely to be injured as those riding youth ATVs.
  • Do not drive an ATV while under the influence of alcohol or drugs. Alcohol and drugs impair reaction time and judgment, two essential skills for safe ATV use.
One-sentence take away: Children should drive their own, child-sized ATV and not ride with an adult or on an adult ATV—and always wear a helmet.
Blog first published Sept 7, 2014 on Calvert Education blog.http://blog.calverteducation.com/featured/worrying-smarter-singing-the-atv-blues/

Friday, September 5, 2014

Grappling with the Worst Fear: Child Abduction

Kitsap County, Washington is still reeling from revelations that one of their 17-year olds on the local high school wrestling team has just been charged with the abduction and murder of his 6-year old neighbor. Similar stories have appeared in the last month in New York (two sisters), New Hampshire (a teen returning abducted while walking home), and Philadelphia (a student abducted at her elementary school)--but all these children returned alive.

Child as crossing guard

Child abduction ranks at the top of parents’ concerns for their children,[i] and it’s one of the most common questions I get. So, just how common is it?

Estimates[ii]—albeit rough estimates because the numbers are so low—are that one in six hundred thousand children is abducted by a stranger annually. Children are one thousand times more likely to be abducted by their own mom, dad, or close relative, often for reasons far from that child’s well-being, including bitterness during a custody battle.[iii]

Despite the comparisons, some might say, “Less than one in a million? That is more than I thought! After all, it is much more likely than winning the lottery, which is easily one in a few million!”[iv] And stereotypical abduction is also still fifteen times more likely than a child’s death from being hit by lightning. Here’s what little can be pieced together.

Research, again based on very small numbers, suggests that stereotypical abductions are most likely to happen:

1.      About the age you start thinking you’ve made it past this worry (average age is about 11).
2.      By someone younger than you might think (almost 60 percent of abductors are under twenty-nine and many are in their late teens).
3.      Right near your house (within three blocks, but includes the front yard).

Victims
The typical victim of abduction and murder is a white (75 percent) girl (74 percent) about twelve years old (average age was between eleven and twelve) from a middle-class (35 percent) or blue-collar (36 percent) family living in a single-family residence (71 percent) with a good family situation (50 percent) and considered a low-risk (84 percent), average kid.[v] 

Don’t think of kidnappings as about kids under ten; twelve- to fourteen-year-olds show the highest rates of stereotypical abduction and two times the rate one would expect based on their numbers in the population (see graph). Boys are not immune to stereotypical abduction. While girls are still disproportionately represented, almost one-third (31 percent) of the kidnapping victims were boys. For many kidnappers, this is a crime of opportunity not necessarily dependent on child gender.  Whites and blacks were also disproportionately represented. Eighty percent of the victims were white (though only 65 percent of the population) and 20 percent were black (15 percent of the population).


For those who are concerned about infant abduction, there are disproportionately low rates and estimates are that fewer than twenty occur annually. One study[vi] that looked at infant abduction over ten years (1983–1992) found that the abductors were usually women, disproportionately black (43 percent), and abducted male and female infants at about the same rate. Three-quarters of the infants were recovered within five days.

Perpetrators
The perpetrators were likely to be men (estimates ranged from 86 to 99 percent), but about half of the time they had partners in their crime. Let me repeat that: almost half (48 percent) of the children abducted were abducted by more than one person. Further, more than 20 percent of perpetrators were teenagers (between thirteen and nineteen years old). The research on child molesters suggests that most molest for the first time during their teenage years.[vii] Fifty-seven percent of perpetrators were less than thirty years old. A study of over eight hundred child abduction–murders found that the oldest murderer was sixty-one and the youngest was nine. The median age of those who killed was about twenty-eight.[viii] The image of the older, lone man does not hold up to statistics. Almost two-thirds had prior arrests for violent crimes, with slightly more than half of those prior crimes committed already against children. One in ten murderers had already killed or attempted to kill another child.[ix] To search for registered sex offenders near you, you can search by zip code at the Dru Sjodin National Sex Offender Public Website, http://www.nsopw.gov/Core/Portal.aspx.[x] You will likely get more information by going to your state’s page (search “sex offender registry”). Map out both the offender’s home and work addresses, and the likely route in between. When I typed one of our local offender’s work addresses into Google Maps, I found out that the unassuming address where he was listed as working was actually a popular gym near our home—a gym with child care services. 

Note the consistent early onset: most molesters begin molesting before the age of twenty, the molestation likely begins within the family, and the early victims frequently do not report. This suggests that it is a big mistake to excuse an older sibling’s molesting a younger one as “experimenting,” especially since early treatment of pedophilia may make all the difference.[xi]

The Scene
Where is the abduction occurring? About one in every six stereotypical abductions (16 percent) happens in the child’s own home or yard. Given that the age of victims is often eleven or twelve, the idea that their own front yard is not safe may be quite disturbing. Two out of five (40 percent) are in streets or cars.

Unlike murderers in general, child abduction murderers were “much less likely to select certain types of victims based on personal characteristics” (e.g., blond hair). Only 10 percent selected victims for those reasons. Forty percent of murderers selected their victim purely because the opportunity presented itself. In another 14 percent they had an existing relationship that let them create an opportunity. [xii]

The National council on Missing and Exploited Children (NCMEC) analyzed more than 4,200 attempted abductions for the five-year period from February 2005 and March 2010 and found that the five most common lures, often from a car, included offering a child a ride, offering the child candy or sweets, showing the child an animal or asking for help finding a lost animal, offering the child money, and asking the child for directions.

What to Do
A critical finding of a NCMEC study was that “children were their own best protectors.” Simply being with another friend is not enough.[xiii] Among nearly 3,500 cases of attempted abduction, 31 percent of children yelled, kicked, or pulled away and 53 percent walked or ran away. “The child should do whatever is necessary to stay out of the car, because once the child is in that car, it dramatically reduces the chances of escape,” NCMEC Director Ernie Allen said. Only 16 percent received help from an adult.

NCMEC emphasizes that parents also “need to understand that most of those who abduct children are not ‘strangers.’” Teaching “stranger danger” may not be an effective strategy. If children know the person at all, which is true in the majority of cases, they won’t consider the person a stranger.

Abbreviated List of Back-to-School Safety Tips
from the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children
www.missingkids.com.
  1. Teach your children that if anyone bothers them or makes them feel scared or uncomfortable, they should trust their feelings and immediately get away from that person. Teach them it is OK not to be polite and IT IS OK TO SAY NO.
  2. Teach your children that if anyone tries to take them somewhere, they should RESIST by kicking and screaming, try to run away, and DRAW ATTENTION by kicking and screaming, “This person is trying to take me away” or “This person is not my father/mother.”
  3. Teach your children NOT TO ACCEPT A RIDE from anyone unless you have said it is OK in that instance. If anyone follows them in a vehicle, they should turn around, go in the other direction, and run to a trusted adult for help.
  4. Teach your children that grownups should NOT ASK CHILDREN FOR DIRECTIONS or for any other assistance--other than to go to get an adult.
  5. Teach your children to NEVER ACCEPT MONEY OR GIFTS from anyone unless you have told them it is OK in each instance.
  6. Teach your children to always CHECK FIRST before changing their plans before or after school. Teach your children to never leave school with anyone unless they CHECK FIRST with you or another trusted adult, even if someone tells them it is an emergency.
If your child goes missing, call the police. Police want (or should want) you to call them even if you are unsure whether your child is actually missing. Why? Because if bad things are going to happen, they happen fast. Estimates of deceased victims show that half were murdered in the first hour (47 percent), three-quarters within the first two hours (76 percent), and almost nine out of ten (89 percent) in the first twenty-four hours.[xiv] The sooner the parents call, the better. Remember though that more than half (57 percent) of children are returned alive[xv] and 90 percent of the episodes are over within twenty-four hours.

Take-away: Drop talks of “stranger-danger” and teach your the basic steps for when to run away and how to fight back if approached.




[i] Ernest Allen, “Keeping Children Safe: Rhetoric and Reality,” Juvenile Justice Journal V, no. 1 (May 1998).
[ii] Data in this chapter come from the National Incidence Studies of Missing, Abducted, Runaway, and Thrownaway Children (NISMART) (https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/ojjdp/196467.pdf) unless otherwise noted.
[iii] Ernest Allen, “The Kid Is with a Parent, How Bad Can It Be?,” The Crisis of Family Abductions (1998).
[iv] Check out Discover’s Webmath.com to calculate your odds given the specifics of the lottery: http://www.webmath.com/lottery.html.
[v] Brown, Keppel, Weis, and Skeen, 2006.
[vii] Able and Harlow, “Child Molestation Prevention Study” (2002), http://www.childmolestationprevention.org/pdfs/study.pdf.
[viii] Brown, Keppel, Weis, and Skeen, 2006.
[ix] Ibid.
[x] Having said that, I’d be remiss if I didn’t point out that studies[x] have not found a significant difference in prevention of new offenses resulting from the registries. It is unclear why no effect was found (e.g., did people not use the registries). Overall, rates of abduction in the places studied went down, so the changes may be masked or there may be an overall discouragement because of the registries.
[xi] Child Molestation Research and Prevention Institute, http://www.childmolestationprevention.org/pages/focus_on_the_cause.html.
[xii] Brown, Keppel, Weis, and Skeen, 2006, p. 30
[xiii] Gallagher, Bradford, and Pease, “Attempted and Completed Incidents of Stranger-Perpetrated Child Sexual Abuse and Abduction,” Centre for Applied Childhood Studies, Harold Wilson Building, University of Huddersfield, Queensgate, Huddersfield HD1 3DH, United Kingdom, 32, no. 5: 517–28 (May 2008), e-pub May 29, 2008.
[xiv] Brown, Keppel, Weis, and Skeen, 2006.
[xv] NISMART, 2002.